Data Brokers: What They Are & Why You Should Care

Sunglass woman pink

So we’ve talked about how necessary it is for companies to maintain data transparency, and we’ve discussed the insane amount of information they collect and circulate, but what we haven’t gone into yet is the role of the data-mining companies themselves. Today we’re going to fix that, while also introducing some additional big data terminology to your lexicon.

As this 2012 CNN article explains, there are companies out there, fondly termed data brokers, that “collect things like contact information, demographics and your preferences on things” and then “aggregate that information to try to discern a picture of what people the-white-house-report-on-big-data-too-little-too-latewant.” CBS News defines them as “collecting, analyzing and packaging some of our most sensitive personal information and selling it as a commodity…to each other, to advertisers, even the government, often without our direct knowledge.” FYI, I’m not talking about Facebook anymore. No, this is that mysterious “third party” that you’ll find in nearly every TOS you’ve ever agreed to, it’s the all-knowing “them” I’ve referred to in every post. The CNN article introduces one such company called Acxiom. In an interview with the reporter, Acxiom CEO Scott Howe proudly offered the above quotes I used as a definition for data brokers while going on to explain the necessity of his company’s services. Thankfully, the article’s author goes on to report the many potential issues with these data brokers, particularly these following points:

1. “the average consumer has no idea that their intimate personal details are up for sale on these sites”

My bets are on the fact that you never knew Acxiom existed.But Acxiom knows your name, number, where you live, your gender and all the things you like and don’t like. You’ve never visited their site, and yet they’ve got a nice fat folder with your name on it, for sale to their various clients.

2. “data mining could open the door to hacking, identity theft and stalking.

What companies like Acxiom do, and what all data brokers do, is create these enormous dossiers containing a lot of really important information on you. It doesn’t matter if you have “nothing to hide,” any law abiding citizen can have their entire lives hacked awaFacebooks-data-broker-partnersy by anyone savvy enough with a computer to get into whichever data mining company they so choose.  A security researcher from Dell SecureWorks explains that, “just basic information…can lead predators to potential victims… That’s a common scenario, actually.”

The article goes on to state several more critiques and I definitely recommend reading it if you’ve got some time.

DD_LOGO02_whiteThe funny thing about these data brokers is that they seem to float in this mysterious grey area, a giant legislative question mark surrounds what they do and how they do it. There’s no federal regulation encouraging them to encrypt the information they have on you or otherwise keep it protected. CBS News explains that data brokers have always been around, but have grown immensely in voData Brokerlume as of late. What used to be somewhat harmless collections from surveys and phone calls has become malicious and dangerous. The author explains, “No one even knows how many companies there are trafficking in our data. But it’s certainly in the thousands, and would include research firms, all sorts of Internet companies, advertisers, retailers and trade associations. The largest data broker is Acxiom, a marketing giant that brags it has, on average, 1,500 pieces of information on more than 200 million Americans.” Can you even imagine what 1500 pieces of information on you would look like?

Data Brokers are viewed with plenty of criticism, which is something we are extremely happy to see. It’s great that big news names like CNN and CBS News are educating their readers about Big Data and explaining the numerous consequences that follow in data mining companies’ wake. Hopefully this post has helped clarify all those “them”s I’ve been referencing, while making the chain of information a little clearer.

There are some tools out there you can use to reduce the amount of information these companies have, such as Abine, a company that claims to quite literally “remove your information from data broker sites.” Of course this service comes at a cost, and cannot guarantee that everything will be found and removed. So remember, as always #thinkbeforeyouclick and be careful what you do online. Nothing is private, and you never know who’s watching.

394bc138405c86bb5681be20af73

Confused by Big Data?

Sunglass woman pink

Or maybe you just need to learn about it in a different way. Terms of Service is a digital graphic novel that humorously explores not only Big Data but the relationship that develops between you and various companies as a result. Take a look if you’re interested in learning about the more complex concepts of Big Data in a funny, easy-to-understand way.

Screen Shot 2015-03-31 at 10.28.30 PM

Employers and Social Media: A Refutation

Featured imageA major issue that is becoming increasingly more prominent in the workforce is whether or not employers should be able to access your personal social media accounts, such as Facebook and Twitter, to pass judgments about your life and your character. These judgments can play into whether or not you are hired in the company, or if you should maintain your job in the chance that your social media profiles display some sort of characteristic that a boss or employer does not agree with.

The Business Week article, “Employers, Get Outta My Facebook,” claims that, “when considering job applicants, prospective employers have no business poking around their profiles on social networking sites.” This article makes a few claims regarding the dangers and risks of having employerLarge Man Looking At Co-Worker With A Magnifying Glasss and bosses view the social media sites of potential and current employees, such as the unearthing of inaccurate information or a misrepresentation of a person’s true character from just a few instances on their site. The article also argues that even if a person makes their profile public, a public profile is a method for “casually interacting with others in an informal setting, on personal free time.” Whatever the risk, this article declares that employers should not be allowed free roam of a person’s social media accounts in order to make job-related judgments and evaluations.

I am in disagreement in reference to the argument that this article presents, in the sense that your information online is in a public domain, so employers do have a right to view the content, but they should do so only if you are fully aware that they are. When it comes to internet privacy and data transparency, a person has the right to know if someone is using their information – that is displayed on a public forum – in passing judgment or forming opinions. While information that is publicly available is legally allowed to be used in reporting and news, it should be in the right of individuals to be fully aware and notified of where and how their personal data is used when it is taken from online sources. In whole, public information is public for a reason – for all people to use it. But, the information should be used sensibly and with the person’s knowledge that you are using their personal information.

The Business Week article does present some possible benefits of employers being able to use your online information from social media websites, such as your Facebook page serving as an extension of your resume. However, this still does not allow a person facebookprivacy to understand when and how their personal information is used.

In order to best address this problem, employers should have their employees and potential employees sign a document that allows the employer to view social media websites to further research about their staff members. With this, people can understand when and how their information is used, and appropriately adjust their privacy settings if they wish to keep certain aspects about their life completely private.

Save yourself…Delete Facebook Now

Information-Desk-Girl-Emoji-T-Shirts

In the article “Get your loved ones off Facebook” the author, Saintsal, thoroughly breaks down Facebook’s Term of Service and Privacy policy, and yes they are two completely different conditions you agree to! Facebook has an average of 1.393 Billion monthly users, meaning it is watching, following and tracking every search, like, comment, status and messages all 1.393 billion people are doing. Facebook has clearly written out in their privacy settings, which everyone has agreed to-or they wouldn’t be on the site anymore. However how many people have actually read through the term of services before checking the yes box? Most people do not realize Facebook now has “permission to use your name, profile _68918377_bigdatapicture, content and information in connection with commercial, sponsored or related content (such as a brand you like), served or enhanced by us.” Since you checked the tiny box at the bottom of the sing up screen. Hidden gems of data instruction such as these are scattered through Facebook’s term of service. As Saintsal pointed out in his article, now that your profile has been set up all you have to do is continue to use Facebook and you are agreeing to Facebook’s new Terms of Services-which they have just updated again. When Saintsal decided to do some digging about the privacy settings, he discovered disturbing details about no matter how secure your privacy setting might be set to, Facebook still has access to all of your information and will use it without your knowledge or updated consent. Another way Facebook tricks users into believing that Facebook isn’t actually using your data they collect for their own use, is by allowing you to use third-party applications which then act as a cover for Facebook to continue their digging. All of these findings by Saintsal confirm the need for data transparency in social media site, especially Facebook. By finding and creating new ways to sneakily get users to accept Facebook’s tracking methods, without their continual consent written out explicitly.

Author Intro: @Marissupial

Sunglass woman pinkIn choosing to remain somewhat anonymous in this blog, I will introduce myself simply by my class twitter handle @Marissupial. (Feel free to follow, although I generally only post for class). You’ll know which posts are mine whenever you see that little avatar up there.

I am a 21 year old senior at the University of Maryland with a double major in Communications and Ebig-data-speech-bubblenglish. I never really had much of an interest in the tech industry beyond being a basic user and consumer of it, but upon reading several articles I found through reddit I gained a lot of information regarding what was actually happening around me when I used almost any website or application.
As someone who is inherently against the NSA’s mass data collection and surveillance programs and a passionate supporter of privacy rights, understanding what services I personally use do with my data became an utmost priority. Plus it really freaked me out when I would look up an item or article of clothing only to find that same item popping up in various advertisements on different webpages I visited, even in my Facebook newsfeed. This bothered me more than I can put into words; the notion that so much of what I consider private information seemed to all be tracked, stored and sold away to various advertisement companies ready to make a profit. Now, whenever I download an app or consider making an account on a new platform iStock_000001402061Small-499x332or website I actually read the Terms of Service instead of just clicking the “I agree” box. I thought that if I was informed and understood exactly what these companies were going to do, I would feel safer and I could choose not to spend my time on the websites that sought to sell and profit off of any and all data they could get their hands on. But I was wrong.
Many companies don’t go into the nitty gritty of what’s really happening behind closed doors, where your data is actually going and what’s happening to it. Some claim that your data is “anonymized” but do not reveal the fact that upon receipt, other companies can (and do) easily de-anonymize it by connecting it with other data they have on you from other sites. This is why I am a part of this blog; I fundamentally believe in our right as users and consumers to understand in crystal numbersclear terms what is being collected and where it is being sent. Reading through the terms of service shouldn’t require a dictionary and it definitely shouldn’t create fuzzy grey areas that essentially allow companies to do whatever they want with your data, malicious or not, without facing potential consequences.

About us: Crystal Clear

big-data1

We are four students from the University of Maryland who believe that all companies that collect, maintain and redistribute user data should be crystal clear in their terms of service what information they are collecting and exactly what they will be doing with this information. Our position is that it is the right of users and consumers to be fully aware and notified of where their personal data will be going and what will be done with it when using various online services.

It’s time for complete data transparency.

FB : https://www.facebook.com/crystalcleardata1

TW: @eyesoffdata